六基因修饰猪红细胞与人类红细胞的关键理化性质相似性初步研究

Preliminary study on the similarity of key physicochemical properties between six gene modified pig red blood cells and human red blood cells

  • 摘要:
    目的 通过细胞形态、血液学参数、微生物安全性及血清学相容性等多个维度系统评价六基因修饰猪红细胞与人红细胞的相似性并验证六基因修饰猪红细胞作为创伤出血输血替代品的可行性。
    方法  采集O型人供者、六基因修饰O型猪及野生型O型猪的血液样本,通过流式细胞术鉴定猪基因修饰表型,利用场发射扫描电子显微镜观察形态并测量直径,进行血常规、渗透脆性试验、三磷酸腺苷(ATP)及2,3-二磷酸甘油酸(2,3-DPG)含量、血红蛋白饱和度50%时的氧分压(P50)等检测,评估红细胞变形性,采用实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应筛查人兽共患病病毒,用微柱凝胶法、凝聚胺法及盐水试管法进行交叉配血。
    结果  六基因修饰猪红细胞成功敲除α-Gal、Neu5Gc及Sda抗原并表达hCD55,野生型猪红细胞表达上述3种抗原,但不表达人补体调节蛋白。3种红细胞均呈双凹圆盘状形态,O型人血红细胞直径均大于六基因修饰猪红细胞和野生型猪红细胞(均为P<0.05)。O型人平均红细胞体积、平均红细胞血红蛋白均高于六基因修饰猪,O型人红细胞分布宽度-变异系数低于六基因修饰猪(均为P<0.05)。3种红细胞渗透脆性、ATP含量、2,3-DPG含量、P50及红细胞变形性指标差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。六基因修饰猪与野生型猪红细胞的人兽共患病病毒筛查均为阴性。交叉配血结果显示,微柱凝胶法与凝聚胺法中六基因修饰猪红细胞与人红细胞主、次侧均无凝集,而野生型猪红细胞在所有配血方法中均与人红细胞发生明显凝集。
    结论  六基因修饰猪红细胞在形态、关键血液学参数、能量代谢、携氧能力、力学特性、微生物安全性及血清学相容性等方面均与人红细胞高度接近,为异种输血的临床转化提供实验基础。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To systematically evaluate the similarities between six-gene-modified pig red blood cells and human red blood cells in multiple dimensions, including cell morphology, hematological parameters, microbial safety and serological compatibility, and to verify the feasibility of using six-gene-modified pig red blood cells as an alternative for blood transfusion in cases of traumatic hemorrhage.
    Methods  Blood samples from O-type human donor, six-gene-modified O-type pig and wild-type O-type pig were collected. The pig gene-modified phenotype was identified by flow cytometry. The morphology was observed using field emission scanning electron microscopy and the diameter was measured. Hematological tests, including blood routine, osmotic fragility test, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) content and partial pressure of oxygen at 50% hemoglobin saturation (P50), were conducted to assess the deformability of red blood cells. Real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to screen for zoonotic viruses, and cross-matching was performed using column gel method, condensation amine method and saline tube method.
    Results  The six-gene-modified pig red blood cells successfully knocked out the α-Gal, Neu5Gc and Sda antigens and expressed hCD55. Wild-type pig red blood cells expressed these three antigens but did not express human complement regulatory proteins. All three types of red blood cells presented a biconcave discoid morphology. The diameter of O-type human red blood cells was larger than that of the six-gene-modified porcine red blood cells and wild-type pig red blood cells (all P < 0.05). The average red blood cell volume and average red blood cell hemoglobin of O-type humans were higher than those of the six-gene-modified pig red blood cells, and the distribution width-variable coefficient of O-type human red blood cells was lower than that of the six-gene-modified pig red blood cells (all P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the permeability fragility, ATP content, 2,3-DPG content, P50 and red blood cell deformability indicators of the three types of red blood cells (all P > 0.05). The screening for zoonotic viruses in human and animal cells of the six-gene-modified pigs and wild-type pigs was negative. The cross-matching results showed that in the column gel method and condensation amine method, the primary and secondary sides of the six-gene-modified pig red blood cells did not agglutinate with human red blood cells, while the wild-type pig red blood cells agglutinated with human red blood cells in all cross-matching methods.
    Conclusions  The six-gene-modified pig red blood cells are highly similar to human red blood cells in terms of morphology, key hematological parameters, energy metabolism, oxygen-carrying capacity, mechanical properties, microbial safety and serological compatibility, providing an experimental basis for the clinical transformation of xenotransfusion.

     

/

返回文章
返回