基于机器学习的成人活体肝移植术中再灌注后综合征风险预测

Risk prediction of post-reperfusion syndrome during adult living donor liver transplantation based on machine learning

  • 摘要:
    目的  比较多种模型并解析SHAP特征贡献来构建成人活体肝移植(LDLT)术中再灌注后综合征(PRS)的机器学习风险预测模型。
    方法  收集2023年5月至2025年4月因终末期肝病在安徽医科大学第一附属医院接受LDLT的390例患者的临床资料。比较随机森林、逻辑回归、XGBoost、决策树和AdaBoost五种机器学习模型。基于Lasso回归进行特征筛选,训练集使用五折分层交叉验证,最后在独立测试集上评估了模型的泛化能力。基于召回率、准确率、精确率、曲线下面积(AUC)、F1值等关键评价指标对模型进行综合比较,从而确定最优模型。
    结果  筛选出8个用于预测PRS的潜在因素。随机森林模型在训练集与测试集中均展现出最优预测性能,在测试集中其准确率高达84.2%(AUC=0.894,95%可信区间0.808~0.964)。通过SHAP值分析确定了PRS预测因子的重要性排序,冷缺血时间、无肝期K+和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分均被确定为最显著的预测因子。
    结论  基于冷缺血时间、门静脉阻断时间、再灌注前体温、无肝期碱剩余、无肝期K+、MELD评分、左心室舒张末期内径以及移植物体积与标准肝体积比值8个关键指标,采用随机森林算法构建出的PRS预测模型在测试集中表现出最优的预测性能,为后续的临床预测提供了一定帮助。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  To compare multiple models and analyze SHAP feature contributions to construct a machine learning risk prediction model for post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) during adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).
    Methods  Clinical data of 390 patients who underwent LDLT due to end-stage liver disease at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from May 2023 to April 2025 were collected. Five machine learning models, including random forest, logistic regression, XGBoost, decision tree, and AdaBoost, were compared. Feature selection was performed using Lasso regression, and the training set was divided into five folds for stratified cross-validation. The generalization ability of the model was evaluated on the independent test set. The models were comprehensively compared based on key evaluation indicators such as recall rate, accuracy rate, precision rate, area under the curve (AUC) and F1 value, to determine the optimal model.
    Results  Eight potential factors for predicting PRS were selected. The random forest model demonstrated the best prediction performance in both the training set and the test set. Its accuracy rate was as high as 84.2% (AUC = 0.894, 95% confidence interval 0.808-0.964) in the test set. The importance ranking of PRS predictors was determined through SHAP value analysis. Cold ischemia time, K+ during the anhepatic period and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score were all identified as the most significant predictors.
    Conclusions  Based on eight key indicators including cold ischemia time, portal vein occlusion time, pre-reperfusion body temperature, alkaline reserve during the anhepatic period, K+ during the anhepatic period, MELD score, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and graft volume to standard liver volume ratio, the PRS prediction model constructed using the random forest algorithm demonstrates the best prediction performance in the test set, providing certain assistance for subsequent clinical predictions.

     

/

返回文章
返回