Volume 13 Issue 5
Sep.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION  > 2022  >  13(5): 678-682
Dong Shangxin, Shi Huibo, Zhao Yuanyuan, et al. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of donor kidney quality[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 13(5): 678-682. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2022.05.020
Citation: Dong Shangxin, Shi Huibo, Zhao Yuanyuan, et al. Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of donor kidney quality[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 13(5): 678-682. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2022.05.020
shu

Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation of donor kidney quality

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2022.05.020

  • Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation of National Health Commission of China, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Jiang Jipin, Email: jpjiang@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2022-04-19
    Available Online: 2022-09-14
  • Publish Date: 2022-09-15
    Abstract
  • In recent years, although the quantity of organ donation after citizen's death has been constantly increased, a large number of patients with end-stage renal diseases are waiting for kidney transplantation every year. The imbalance between donor and recipient is still one of the main problems affecting kidney transplantation in clinical practice. Therefore, it is of clinical significance to accurately evaluate the quality of donor kidney and fully utilize the expanded criteria donor kidney. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound has been gradually applied in the detection of multiple solid organs due to its safety, portability, real-time detection, quantification and other characteristics, and it also has promising application prospect in the evaluation of donor kidney quality. In this article, the advantages and limitations of current evaluation methods for donor kidney and current status and advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in donor kidney evaluation were reviewed, and the application prospect of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of donor kidney quality was discussed, aiming to increase the methods and enhance the accuracy for donor kidney evaluation, and provide reference for rational use of expanded criteria donor kidney.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(31)
  • [1]
    COEMANS M, SÜSAL C, DÖHLER B, et al. Analyses of the short- and long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation in Europe between 1986 and 2015[J]. Kidney Int, 2018, 94(5): 964-973. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.05.018.
    [2]
    NYBERG SL, MATAS AJ, KREMERS WK, et al. Improved scoring system to assess adult donors for cadaver renal transplantation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2003, 3(6): 715-721. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00111.x.
    [3]
    ANGLICHEAU D, LOUPY A, LEFAUCHEUR C, et al. A simple clinico-histopathological composite scoring system is highly predictive of graft outcomes in marginal donors[J]. Am J Transplant, 2008, 8(11): 2325-2334. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02394.x.
    [4]
    RAO PS, SCHAUBEL DE, GUIDINGER MK, et al. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index[J]. Transplantation, 2009, 88(2): 231-236. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ac620b.
    [5]
    CLAYTON PA, DANSIE K, SYPEK MP, et al. External validation of the US and UK kidney donor risk indices for deceased donor kidney transplant survival in the Australian and New Zealand population[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2019, 34(12): 2127-2131. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfz090.
    [6]
    PETERS-SENGERS H, HEEMSKERK MBA, GESKUS RB, et al. Validation of the prognostic kidney donor risk index scoring system of deceased donors for renal transplantation in the Netherlands[J]. Transplantation, 2018, 102(1): 162-170. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001889.
    [7]
    ZHONG Y, SCHAUBEL DE, KALBFLEISCH JD, et al. Reevaluation of the kidney donor risk index[J]. Transplantation, 2019, 103(8): 1714-1721. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002498.
    [8]
    LIAPIS H, GAUT JP, KLEIN C, et al. Banff histopathological consensus criteria for preimplantation kidney biopsies[J]. Am J Transplant, 2017, 17(1): 140-150. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13929.
    [9]
    REMUZZI G, GRINYÒ J, RUGGENENTI P, et al. Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. Double Kidney Transplant Group (DKG)[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1999, 10(12): 2591-2598. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V10122591.
    [10]
    MUNIVENKATAPPA RB, SCHWEITZER EJ, PAPADIMITRIOU JC, et al. The Maryland aggregate pathology index: a deceased donor kidney biopsy scoring system for predicting graft failure[J]. Am J Transplant, 2008, 8(11): 2316-2324. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02370.x.
    [11]
    YAP YT, HO QY, KEE T, et al. Impact of pre-transplant biopsy on 5-year outcomes of expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation[J]. Nephrology (Carlton), 2021, 26(1): 70-77. DOI: 10.1111/nep.13788.
    [12]
    PHILLIPS BL, KASSIMATIS T, ATALAR K, et al. Chronic histological changes in deceased donor kidneys at implantation do not predict graft survival: a single-centre retrospective analysis[J]. Transpl Int, 2019, 32(5): 523-534. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13398.
    [13]
    GIROLAMI I, GAMBARO G, GHIMENTON C, et al. Pre-implantation kidney biopsy: value of the expertise in determining histological score and comparison with the whole organ on a series of discarded kidneys[J]. J Nephrol, 2020, 33(1): 167-176. DOI: 10.1007/s40620-019-00638-7.
    [14]
    MAZZUCCO G, MAGNANI C, FORTUNATO M, et al. The reliability of pre-transplant donor renal biopsies (PTDB) in predicting the kidney state. a comparative single-centre study on 154 untransplanted kidneys[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010, 25(10): 3401-3408. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq166.
    [15]
    VONBRUNN E, ANGELONI M, BÜTTNER-HEROLD M, et al. Can gene expression analysis in zero-time biopsies predict kidney transplant rejection?[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2022, 9: 793744. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.793744.
    [16]
    SALINAS SJF, PÉREZ RE, LÓPEZ MC, et al. Impact of cold ischemia time in clinical outcomes in deceased donor renal transplant[J]. Transplant Proc, 2020, 52(4): 1118-1122. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.010.
    [17]
    HELANTERÄ I, IBRAHIM HN, LEMPINEN M, et al. Donor age, cold ischemia time, and delayed graft function[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2020, 15(6): 813-821. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.13711119.
    [18]
    ZULPAITE R, MIKNEVICIUS P, LEBER B, et al. Ex-vivo kidney machine perfusion: therapeutic potential[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2021, 8: 808719. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.808719.
    [19]
    MEISTER FA, CZIGANY Z, RIETZLER K, et al. Decrease of renal resistance during hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion is associated with early allograft function in extended criteria donation kidney transplantation[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 17726. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74839-7.
    [20]
    COPUR S, YAVUZ F, SAG AA, et al. Future of kidney imaging: functional magnetic resonance imaging and kidney disease progression[J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2022, 52(5): e13765. DOI: 10.1111/eci.13765.
    [21]
    CHONG WK, PAPADOPOULOU V, DAYTON PA. Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: current status and future[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018, 43(4): 762-772. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1516-1.
    [22]
    KUTTY S, BIKO DM, GOLDBERG AB, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in pediatric echocardiography[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2021, 51(12): 2408-2417. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05119-3.
    [23]
    LEE SC, TCHELEPI H, KHADEM N, et al. Imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pictorial essay[J]. Ultrasound Q, 2022, 38(1): 2-12. DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000574.
    [24]
    JEON SK, LEE JY, KANG HJ, et al. Additional value of superb microvascular imaging of ultrasound examinations to evaluate focal liver lesions[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2022, 152: 110332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110332.
    [25]
    PANG EHT, CHAN A, HO SG, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver: optimizing technique and clinical applications[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018, 210(2): 320-332. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.17843.
    [26]
    OLSON MC, ABEL EJ, MANKOWSKI GETTLE L. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal imaging and intervention[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2019, 20(11): 73. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-019-0936-y.
    [27]
    KAZMIERSKI B, DEURDULIAN C, TCHELEPI H, et al. Applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the kidney[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018, 43(4): 880-898. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1307-0.
    [28]
    KAZMIERSKI BJ, SHARBIDRE KG, ROBBIN ML, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of renal transplants[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2020, 39(12): 2457-2468. DOI: 10.1002/jum.15339.
    [29]
    JIN Y, YANG C, WU S, et al. A novel simple noninvasive index to predict renal transplant acute rejection by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography[J]. Transplantation, 2015, 99(3): 636-641. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000382.
    [30]
    MUELLER-PELTZER K, NEGRÃO DE FIGUEIREDO G, FISCHEREDER M, et al. Vascular rejection in renal transplant: diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared to biopsy[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2018, 69(1/2): 77-82. DOI: 10.3233/CH-189115.
    [31]
    RANGANATH PG, ROBBIN ML, BACK SJ, et al. Practical advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abdominopelvic radiology[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2018, 43(4): 998-1012. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1442-7.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(1)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (252) PDF downloads(82) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    WeChat Subscription Account

    Wechat Service Account

    Contact Us
    • Tel：020-38736410
    • Email: organtranspl@163.com
    • Address：The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou
    • Editorial Office of Organ Transplantation  粤ICP备2021030844号
    Links

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return