Investigation of current status of citizen's attitude to legislation of brain death criteria

Li Xiaoshan; Miao Junyan; Hu Di; Qian Gongtao

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.01.014

Volume 11 Issue 1

Jan. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION > 2020 > 11(1): 87-92

Li Xiaoshan, Miao Junyan, Hu Di, et al. Investigation of current status of citizen's attitude to legislation of brain death criteria[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 11(1): 87-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.01.014

Citation:

PDF( 979 KB)

Investigation of current status of citizen's attitude to legislation of brain death criteria

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.01.014

Department of Medical Affairs, Organ Donation and Transplant Management Office, Wuxi People's Hospital, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, China

More Information

Corresponding author: Qian Gongtao, Email: qiangongtao@sina.com
Received Date: 2019-10-09
Available Online: 2021-01-19
Publish Date: 2020-01-15

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To investigate the citizen's attitude towards the cognition of brain death and the legislation of brain death criteria. Methods A questionnaire survey was performed in 1 500 outpatients or accompanying personnel by the convenient sampling method. The questionnaire data were independently recorded by two professionals using the Epidata 3.02 software. The factors influencing the citizen's support of the legislation of brain death were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Logistic regression models. Results Among 1 433 eligible respondents, 84.65% (1 213/1 433) of them knew brain death, and 24.32% (295/1 213) considered brain death as a reasonable criterion for death. The proportion of respondents who supported and opposed the legislation of brain death was 49.79% (604/1 213) and 17.31% (210/1 213).Male [odds ratio (OR)=1.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.6], those with junior college degree or above at educational level (OR=1.5, 95%CI 1.1-1.9), those whose relatives and friends were engaged in organ donation (OR=3.3, 95%CI 1.1-10.3), those who participated in public welfare activities of organ donation (OR=3.1, 95%CI 1.6-6.0) and those who regarded brain death as a reasonable criterion for death (OR=2.0, 95%CI 1.5-2.6) were more inclined to support the legislation of brain death, which were the independent influencing factors of the legislation of brain death (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Citizens have relatively low cognition and support of the legislation of brain death criteria. Relevant propaganda on brain death should be widely carried out to strengthen the citizen basis for the legislation.
- Brain death,
- Organ donation,
- Organ transplantation,
- Brain death criterion,
- Legislation,
- Donation after citizen's death,
- Donation after brain death followed by cardiac death,
- Donation after cardiac death

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	中国人体器官捐献管理中心.捐献完成登记捐献志愿登记[EB/OL].[2019-05-30]. http://www.rcsccod.cn/.
[2]	黄洁夫, 叶啟发.建立中国模式的公民器官捐献体系, 为人民群众提供高质量的器官移植医疗服务[J].武汉大学学报(医学版), 2017, 38(6):861-865. DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8852.2017.06.001. HUANG JF, YE QF. Establishing the Chinese model of organ donation and transplant system to provide high level ethical transplant service for the Chinese people[J]. Med J Wuhan Univ, 2017, 38(6):861-865. DOI: 10.14188/j.1671-8852.2017.06.001.
[3]	中华医学会器官移植学分会.中国公民逝世后器官捐献流程和规范(2019版)[J].器官移植, 2019, 10(2):122-127. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2019.02.003. Branch of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Medical Association. Process and specification of Chinese donation after citizen's death (2019 edition)[J]. Organ Transplant, 2019, 10(2):122-127. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2019.02.003.
[4]	屈伸.浅谈脑死亡立法的必要性及立法建议[J].法制与社会, 2016, (25):269-270.DOI:10.19387/j.cnki.1009- 0592.2016.09.128. QU S. The necessity and suggestions of legislation on brain death[J]. Leg System Soc, 2016, (25):269-270. DOI: 10.19387/j.cnki.1009-0592.2016.09.128.
[5]	中国人体器官捐献管理中心.2018两会观察: 遗体和人体器官捐献议题再获关注[EB/OL].[2018-03-19]. https://www.codac.org.cn/news/newsinformation/20180319/696800.htm.
[6]	蔡昱.对我国脑死亡的立法形式、立法内容及判断程序的建议[J].中国医学伦理学, 2019, 32(2):187-194. DOI: 10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2019.02.11. CAI Y. Suggestions on the legislative form, legislative content and judgment procedure of brain death in China[J]. Chin Med Ethics, 2019, 32(2):187-194. DOI: 10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2019.02.11.
[7]	王霖婧, 郏将希, 王璐璐, 等.不同人群对脑死亡认识及立法可行性调查报告[J].医学信息, 2019, 32(10):133-135. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.044. WANG LJ, JIA JX, WANG LL, et al. Report on the understanding of brain death and legislative feasibility of different populations[J]. Med Inform, 2019, 32(10): 133-135. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.10.044.
[8]	ZHANG H, ZHENG J, LIU W, et al. Investigation and strategic analysis of public willingness and attitudes toward organ donation in east China[J]. Transplant Proc, 2015, 47(8):2419-2424. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.09.011.
[9]	HU D, HUANG H. Knowledge, attitudes, and willingness toward organ donation among health professionals in China[J]. Transplantation, 2015, 99(7):1379-1385. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000798.
[10]	张立民, 张玉平, 郭亚雄, 等.临床医学本科生对脑死亡认识的调查与分析[J].河北北方学院学报(自然科学版), 2017, 33(10):58-60.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1492. 2017.10.019. ZHANG LM, ZHANG YP, GUO YX, et al. Investigation and analysis of cognition for brain death in undergraduates majoring in clinical medicine[J]. J Hebei North Univ (Nat Sci Edition), 2017, 33(10):58-60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1492.2017.10.019.
[11]	杨春华, 陈雪霞, 陈丽, 等.重症监护病房脑死亡后器官捐献认知调查[J].中华医学杂志, 2014, 94(20):1570-1572. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2014.20.013. YANG CH, CHEN XX, CHEN L, et al. Intensive care unit survey of cognition status of donation after brain death[J]. Natl Med J China, 2014, 94(20):1570-1572. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2014.20.013.
[12]	李长兵, 许晓娟.论我国刑法中的死亡标准[J].江西社会科学, 2012, (8):132-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-518X.2012.08.026. LI CB, XU XJ. Discussion on the standard of death in China criminal law[J]. Jiangxi Soc Sci, 2012, (8):132-136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-518X.2012.08.026.
[13]	宋儒亮, 崔小花, 高霑, 等.脑死亡与器官移植立法课堂调查问卷分析[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2009, 9(12):1296-1301.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2009.12.014. SONG RL, CUI XH, GAO Z, et al. Classroom questionnaire of brain death and organ transplant legislation[J]. Chin J Evid Based Med, 2009, 9(12):1296-1301. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2009.12.014.
[14]	新浪网.器官捐献协调员, 这个岗位你听过吗?全国2200多名[EB/OL].[2019-05-01]. https://k.sina.cn/article_2900118455_macdc4bb703300g53x.html?vt=4&pos=91&from=news&subch=onews.
[15]	张平, 贺光社, 王慧鹏, 等.从2起案例看脑死亡立法的现实需求[J].中国医学伦理学, 2016, 29(3):452-454. DOI: 10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2016.03.26. ZHANG P, HE GS, WANG HP, et al. The realistic requirement of brain death legislation from 2 cases[J]. Chin Med Ethics, 2016, 29(3):452-454. DOI: 10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2016.03.26.
[16]	杨颖, 黄海, 邱鸿钟.中国传统文化和观念对器官捐献意愿的影响分析[J].中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(5):803-808.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.05.025. YANG Y, HUANG H, QIU HZ. Influence of traditional Chinese culture and ideas on organ donation[J]. Chin J Tissue Eng Res, 2014, 18(5):803-808. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.05.025.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Tables(2)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (311) PDF downloads(20)

Investigation of current status of citizen's attitude to legislation of brain death criteria

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.01.014

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Investigation of current status of citizen's attitude to legislation of brain death criteria

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.01.014

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content