Volume 11 Issue 5
Sep.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION  > 2020  >  11(5): 584-588
Yang Jian, Xie Yan, Tian Dazhi, et al. Difference of clinical efficacy between surgical magnifying glass and surgical microscope assisted hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 11(5): 584-588. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.05.009
Citation: Yang Jian, Xie Yan, Tian Dazhi, et al. Difference of clinical efficacy between surgical magnifying glass and surgical microscope assisted hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 11(5): 584-588. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.05.009
shu

Difference of clinical efficacy between surgical magnifying glass and surgical microscope assisted hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2020.05.009

  • The First Central College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300110, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Jiang Wentao, Email:447660280@qq.com
  • Received Date: 2020-05-18
    Available Online: 2021-01-19
  • Publish Date: 2020-09-15
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To compare the difference of clinical efficacy between surgical magnifying glass and surgical microscope assisted hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).  Methods  Clinical data of 272 donors and recipients undergoing LDLT were retrospectively analyzed. According to different patterns of hepatic artery reconstruction, all recipients were divided into the magnifying glass group (n=189) and microscope group (n=83). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hepatic artery reconstruction site, diameter of anastomosis, incidence of postoperative complications and survival rate of recipients were statistically compared between two groups.  Results  Compared with the microscope group, the operation time, hepatic artery reconstruction time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly less in the magnifying glass group (all P < 0.001). The most common site of hepatic artery reconstruction was the right hepatic artery in two groups, and the diameter of anastomosis was (2.1±0.9) mm in the magnifying glass group and (2.1±0.8) mm in the microscope group, with no statistical significance between two groups (P > 0.05). The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of recipients in the magnifying glass group were 88%, 86% and 85%, which did not significantly differ from 89%, 87% and 86% in the microscope group (all P > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications did not significantly differ between two groups (all P > 0.05).  Conclusions  The efficacy and safety of hepatic artery reconstruction in LDLT under surgical magnifying glass are equivalent to those under surgical microscope, with less operation workload and intraoperative blood loss. For experienced transplantation surgeons, it is recommended to perform hepatic artery reconstruction assisted by surgical magnifying glass.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(25)
  • [1]
    BOZKURT B, DAYANGAC M, TOKAT Y. Living donor liver transplantation[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2017, 112(3):217-228. DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.3.217.
    [2]
    UCHIYAMA H, HASHIMOTO K, HIROSHIGE S, et al. Hepatic artery reconstruction in living-donor liver transplantation: a review of its techniques and complications[J]. Surgery, 2002, 131(1 Suppl):S200-S204. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.119577.
    [3]
    LUO Y, ZHAO D, ZHANG M, et al. Hepatic artery reconstruction using 3-in-1 segmental resection in pediatric living donor liver transplantation: a case report and literature review[J]. Transplant Proc, 2017, 49(7):1619-1623. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.076.
    [4]
    LEE CF, LU JC, ZIDAN A, et al. Microscope-assisted hepatic artery reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation-a review of 325 consecutive cases in a single center[J]. Clin Transplant, 2017, 31(2). DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12879.
    [5]
    YAGI T, SHINOURA S, UMEDA Y, et al. Surgical rationalization of living donor liver transplantation by abolition of hepatic artery reconstruction under a fixed microscope[J]. Clin Transplant, 2012, 26(6):877-883. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2012.01651.x.
    [6]
    HERNANDEZ JA, MULLENS CL, AOYAMA JT, et al. Analysis of outcomes in living donor liver transplants involving reconstructive microsurgeons[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2020, 36(3):223-227. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401033.
    [7]
    EHANIRE T, SINGHAL D, MAST B, et al. Safety of microsurgery under loupes versus microscope: a head-to-head comparison of 2 surgeons with similar experiences[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2018, 80(Suppl 6):S340-S342. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001324.
    [8]
    HERRERO A, SOUCHE R, JOLY E, et al. Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: what is the impact of the arterial reconstruction type?[J]. World J Surg, 2017, 41(8):2101-2110. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3989-4.
    [9]
    SNEIDERS D, HOUWEN T, PENGEL LHM, et al. Systematic review and Meta-analysis of posttransplant hepatic artery and biliary complications in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 2018, 102(1):88-96. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001936.
    [10]
    KUTLUTURK K, SAHIN TT, KARAKAS S, et al. Early hepatic artery thrombosis after pediatric living donor liver transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2019, 51(4):1162-1168. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.104.
    [11]
    PULITI REIGADA CH, DE ATAIDE EC, DE ALMEIDA PRADO MATTOSINHO T, et al. Hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: five-year experience at the State University of Campinas[J]. Transplant Proc, 2017, 49(4):867-870. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.056.
    [12]
    ZHANG H, QIAN S, LIU R, et al. Interventional treatment for hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2017, 28(8):1116-1122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.04.026.
    [13]
    COMPAGNON P, TOSO C. Selective retransplantation after late hepatic artery thrombosis[J]. Transpl Int, 2019, 32(5):470-472. DOI: 10.1111/tri.13411.
    [14]
    LUI SK, GARCIA CR, MEI X, et al. Re-transplantation for hepatic artery thrombosis: a national perspective[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(10):3357-3363. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4609-7.
    [15]
    MORI K, NAGATA I, YAMAGATA S, et al. The introduction of microvascular surgery to hepatic artery reconstruction in living-donor liver transplantation-its surgical advantages compared with conventional procedures[J]. Transplantation, 1992, 54(2):263-268. DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199208000-00014.
    [16]
    ZUO KJ, DRAGINOV A, PANOSSIAN A, et al. Microvascular hepatic artery anastomosis in pediatric living donor liver transplantation: 73 consecutive cases performed by a single surgeon[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 142(6):1609-1619. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005044.
    [17]
    PARK GC, MOON DB, KANG SH, et al. Overcoming hepatic artery thrombosis after living donor liver transplantations: an experience from Asan medical center[J]. Ann Transplant, 2019, 24:588-593. DOI: 10.12659/AOT.919650.
    [18]
    BALCI D, AHN CS. Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation[J]. Curr Opin Organ Transplant, 2019, 24(5):631-636. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000697.
    [19]
    FOUZAS I, PAPANIKOLAOU C, KATSANOS G, et al. Hepatic artery anatomic variations and reconstruction in liver grafts procured in Greece: the effect on hepatic artery thrombosis[J]. Transplant Proc, 2019, 51(2):416-420. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.078.
    [20]
    JWA EK, KIM JD, CHOI DL. Comparison of hepatic artery reconstruction using surgical loupe and operating microscope during living donor liver transplantation focusing on the beginner's point[J]. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2019, 23(2):122-127. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.2.122.
    [21]
    MARUBASHI S, KOBAYASHI S, WADA H, et al. Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: risk factor analysis of complication and a role of MDCT scan for detecting anastomotic stricture[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(11):2671-2677. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2188-1.
    [22]
    OKOCHI M, OKOCHI H, SAKABA T, et al. Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: strategy of the extension of graft or recipient artery[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 2019, 53(4):216-220. DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2019.1582426.
    [23]
    YAN S, ZHANG QY, YU YS, et al. Microsurgical reconstruction of hepatic artery in living donor liver transplantation: experiences and lessons[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2009, 8(6):575-580.
    [24]
    UCHIYAMA H, SHIRABE K, MORITA M, et al. Expanding the applications of microvascular surgical techniques to digestive surgeries: a technical review[J]. Surg Today, 2012, 42(2):111-120. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-011-0032-5.
    [25]
    VASCONCELOS-FILHO JM, MAGALHÃES PRM, MONTEIRO BR, et al. Frequency of anatomic variations on hepatic arteries and types of reconstruction employed: study on livers prepared for transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2020, 52(5): 1312-1313. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.01.070.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(2)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (156) PDF downloads(15) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    WeChat Subscription Account

    Wechat Service Account

    Contact Us
    • Tel：020-38736410
    • Email: organtranspl@163.com
    • Address：The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou
    • Editorial Office of Organ Transplantation  粤ICP备2021030844号
    Links

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return