Volume 5 Issue 6
Nov.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION  > 2014  >  5(6): 356-359
Chen Lizhong, Wang Daohu, Qiu Jiang, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a report of 22 cases[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 5(6): 356-359. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2014.06.006
Citation: Chen Lizhong, Wang Daohu, Qiu Jiang, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a report of 22 cases[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 5(6): 356-359. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2014.06.006
shu

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a report of 22 cases

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2014.06.006

  • Department of Organ Transplantation, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China

More Information
  • Corresponding author: Chen Lizhong, Email:clz@medmail.com.cn
  • Received Date: 2014-09-09
    Available Online: 2021-01-19
  • Publish Date: 2014-11-15
    Abstract
  •   Objective   To summarize the experience of retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy.   Methods   Clinical data of 22 donors undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2012 to May 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The ureter, renal vessel and perirenal fat were dissected by laparoscopic approach. Then the renal vessels were cut off and the kidney was extracted by hand through superomedial inguinal parallel incision. The surgical process and the postoperative follow-up of the donors were recorded.   Results   One right kidney and 21 left kidneys were extracted. The operations in 22 cases were performed successfully without conversion to laparotomy. The operation time was (123±31) min. The length of kidney extracting incision was (7.2±0.5) cm. The intraoperative blood loss was 15-80 ml and the warm ischemia time was 60-150 s. The length of donor renal arteries was 2.0-3.2 cm. The length of renal veins was 1.0-3.5 cm. The donors were followed up for 1-21 months. The serum creatinine (Scr) levels at 1 d, 1 week and 1 month after operation were (120±57), (95±25), (90±21) μmol/L respectively. Two cases suffered from renal fossa hematoma and poor wound healing after operation respectively. The pain score of the donors was 0-5 at 1 week after operation and 0-1 at 1 month after operation. No donor had the perception that donating kidney had obvious impacts on the general health, but 1 donor felt it had some influence on physical strength.   Conclusions   It is safe to perform retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy on the basis of strict donor selection. It has little impacts on the donor's quality of life with small surgical incision and mild postoperative pain.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(7)
  • [1]
    Yuan H, Liu L, Zheng S, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis[J]. Transplant Proc, 2013, 45(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.152
    [2]
    邱江, 陈国栋, 黄刚, 等. 219例活体肾移植供者长期随访分析[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2013, 34(1):5-7. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZHYX201210002219.htm

    Qiu J, Chen GD, Huang G, et al. Long-term results of 219 living kidney donors[J]. Chin J Organ Transplant, 2013, 34(1):5-7. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZHYX201210002219.htm
    [3]
    Wilson CH, Sanni A, Rix DA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011(11):CD006124. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=1739375799&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [4]
    Hung CJ, Lin YJ, Chang SS, et al. Kidney grafts with multiple renal arteries is no longer a relative contraindication with advance in surgical techniques of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy[J]. Transplant Proc, 2012, 44(1):36-38. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.027
    [5]
    Wang K, Liu DF, Wang L, et al. Inguinal incision as a successful route to extract the kidney during laparoscopic retroperitoneal live-donor nephrectomy[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2013, 11(5):396-369. doi: 10.6002/ect
    [6]
    Hofker HS, Nijboer WN, Niesing J, et al. A randomized clinical trial of living donor nephrectomy: a plea for a differentiated appraisal of mini-open muscle splitting incision and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy[J]. Transpl Int, 2012, 25(9):976-986. doi: 10.1111/tri.2012.25.issue-9
    [7]
    田野, 张磊, 解泽林, 等. 经腹膜后入路腹腔镜活体供肾切取技术的改良及效果观察[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2012, 33(10):580-583.

    Tian Y, Zhang L, Xie ZL, et al. Improvement and effect of retroperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy[J]. Chin J Organ Transplant, 2012, 33(10):580-583.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (78) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    WeChat Subscription Account

    Wechat Service Account

    Contact Us
    • Tel：020-38736410
    • Email: organtranspl@163.com
    • Address：The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No. 600, Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou
    • Editorial Office of Organ Transplantation  粤ICP备2021030844号
    Links

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return