Volume 5 Issue 5
Sep.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Li Jian, Xu Yahong, Guo Yu, et al. Effect of two biological immunologic induction therapies on renal transplant recipients[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 5(5): 299-303. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2014.05.008
Citation: Li Jian, Xu Yahong, Guo Yu, et al. Effect of two biological immunologic induction therapies on renal transplant recipients[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 5(5): 299-303. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2014.05.008

Effect of two biological immunologic induction therapies on renal transplant recipients

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2014.05.008
  • Received Date: 2014-05-08
  • Publish Date: 2014-09-15
  •   Objective   To evaluate efficacy and safety of two different biologicals in immunologic induction therapy on renal transplant recipients.   Methods   Clinical data of 78 renal transplant recipients who received biological immunologic induction therapy in Department of Urology of the 452nd Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army from June 2008 to April 2013,were retrospectively analyzed. According to different biological immunologic induction therapy, the recipients were divided into two groups, monoclonal antibody group(group A, n=35, received treatment of basiliximab) and polyclonal antibody group [group B, n=43, received treatment of antithymocyte globulin(ATG)]. And the other recipients who didn't receive immunologic induction therapy in the hospital during the corresponding period were chosen as control group(group C, n=32). The survival rates of recipient and kidney in 3 groups at 12th weeks after transplantation were analyzed. The levels of serum creatinine(Scr) of recipients in 3 groups were monitored at 7, 14, 30, 60 d after transplantation. The occurrence rates of complications including acute rejection, delayed graft function and infection were compared among 3 groups.   Results   At 12th weeks after transplantation, the survival rates of recipient and kidney in 3 groups were 100% and 100% in group A, 97.7% and 97.7% in group B, 100% and 96.9% in group C. There was no significant difference among 3 groups(all in P>0.05). Compared with group C, the Scr levels in group A and B decreased significantly at 7, 14 d after transplantation(all in P<0.05). Compared with group C, the incidence rates of acute rejection decreased in group A and B(all in P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence rates of delayed graft function among 3 groups(all in P>0.05). The incidence rate of infection in group B was significantly higher than those in group A and C(all in P<0.05).   Conclusion   Immunologic induction therapy is safe and effective in the application on renal transplant recipients.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    蔡俊超,Paul I. Terasaki.免疫诱导治疗可改善器官移植后长期预后:美国器官分配联合网络注册数据分析[J/CD].中华移植杂志: 电子版,2010,4(4):275.

    Cai JC, Terasaki PI. Immune induction therapy improves long-term outcome after organ transplantation: the United States registered for the united network for organ allocation data analysis[J/CD]. Chin J Transplant: Electronic Version,2010,4(4):275.
    [2]
    陈忠华,徐逸.CD25单克隆抗体在临床肾移植中的应用[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2005,14(1):48-49.

    Chen ZH, Xu, Y. Clinical application of CD25 monoclonal antibodies in renal transplantation[J]. Chin J Nephrol Dial Transplant,2005,14(1):48-49.
    [3]
    郑凯,谭建明,吴卫真,等. 舒莱在肾移植免疫诱导治疗中有效性和安全性研究[J].免疫学杂志,2007,23(5):556-558.

    Zheng K, Tan JM, Wu WZ, et al. Efficacy and safety of simulect in renal transplation recipients treated with induction therapy[J]. Immunol J,2007,23(5):556-558.
    [4]
    顾梅, 张昆鹏, 关炳星, 等. 巴昔利单抗与抗胸腺细胞球蛋白在肾移植早期效果的比较[J]. 中国医院药学杂志,2009,29(8): 659-662.

    Gu M, Zhang KP, Guan BX, et al. Comparison of basilimab and antithymocyte globulin for clinical efficacy in the early stage post renal transplantation[J]. Chin Hosp Pharm J,2009,29(8): 659-662.
    [5]
    黎磊石.在肾移植中应用抗CD25单抗诱导治疗的体会[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2005,14(1):47-48.

    Li LS. Application of induction therapy of CD25 monoclonal antibody in renal transplantation[J]. Chin J Nephrol Dial Transplant,2005,14(1):47-48.
    [6]
    黎东伟,刘龙山,李军,等. 国产重组抗CD25人源化单克隆抗体在肾移植免疫诱导中的应用研究[J].器官移植,2013,4(5):274-278,298.

    Li DW, Liu LS, Li J, et al. Application research of domestic recombinant humanized anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody in immunity induction of renal transplantation[J]. Organ Transplant,2013,4(5):274-278,298.
    [7]
    刘光军,黄洪锋,彭文翰,等.肾移植中应用IL-2受体拮抗剂与抗胸腺细胞球蛋白行免疫诱导的长期疗效比较[J].中华器官移植杂志,2012,33(6):331-334.

    Liu GJ, Huang HF, Peng WH, et al. Long-term effectiveness of anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies vs.rabbit antithymocyte globulin as induction therapy in kidney transplantation[J]. Chin J Organ Transplant,2012,33(6):331-334.
    [8]
    Weimer R, Ettrich M, Renner F, et al. ATG induction in renal transplant recipients: long-term hazard of severe infection is associated with long-term functional T cell impairment but not the ATG-induced CD4 cell decline[J]. Hum Immunol,2014,75(6):561-569.
    [9]
    Donckier V, Craciun L, Miqueu P, et al. Expansion of memory-type CD8+ T cells correlates with the failure of early immunosuppression withdrawal after cadaver liver transplantation using high-dose ATG induction and rapamycin[J]. Transplantation,2013,96(3):306-315.
    [10]
    Esposito L, Kamar N, Tkaczuk J, et al. Long-term evolution of lymphocytes subsets after induction therapy based on continuous versus discontinuous administration of anti-thymocyte globulins in renal-transplant patients[J]. Transplant Proc,2005,37(2):785-787.
    [11]
    Kaden J, V lp A, Wesslau C. High graft protection and low incidences of infections, malignancies and other adverse effects with intra-operative high dose ATG-induction: a single centre cohort study of 760 cases[J]. Ann Transplant,2013,18:9-22.
    [12]
    Pilch NA, Taber DJ, Moussa O, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of rabbit antithymocyte globulin compared with IL-2 receptor antagonist induction therapy in kidney transplantation[J]. Ann Surg,2014,259(5):888-893.
    [13]
    Lim WH, Turner RM, Chapman JR, et al. Acute rejection, T-cell-depleting antibodies, and cancer after transplantation[J]. Transplantation,2014,97(8):817-825.
    [14]
    Brokhof MM, Sollinger HW, Hager DR, et al. Antithymocyte globulin is associated with a lower incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies in moderately sensitized renal transplant recipients[J]. Transplantation,2014,97(6):612-617.
    [15]
    Ponticelli C. Basiliximab: efficacy and safety evaluation in kidney transplantation[J]. Expert Opin Drug Saf,2014,13(3):373-381.
    [16]
    Cicora F, Mos F, Paz M, et al. Clinical experience with thymoglobulin and antithymocyte globulin-Fresenius as induction therapy in renal transplant patients: a retrospective study[J]. Exp Clin Transplant,2013,11(5):418-422.
    [17]
    van den Hoogen MW, Kho MM, Abrahams AC, et al. Effect of a single intraoperative high-dose ATG-Fresenius on delayed graft function in donation after cardiac-death donor renal allograft recipients: a randomized study[J]. Exp Clin Transplant,2013,11(2):134-141.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (77) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return