Role of live webcast as a new medium in the propaganda and education of liver transplant recipients
-
摘要:
目的 探讨网络直播作为新型媒介在肝移植受者宣教中的作用。 方法 根据肝移植受者网络直播宣教会议的内容,统计并分析会议的数据信息,包括听者常规信息、会议访问方式、次数及观看时长等信息。比较网络直播与传统方式宣教会议的特点。 结果 截止至直播结束,会议登记人数273人,其中国外参与 2人,国内参与271人。国内注册地包括全国共26个省、自治区及直辖市。总观看次数为1 526次。会议访问方式包括链接直接访问(243人)、微信群访问(22人)、微信聊天访问(7人)、钉钉访问(1人)。观看时长(68± 5)min。与传统方式比较,网络直播宣教会议的登记人数、注册地点增多,提问方式、随访资料填写更加便捷;参会者无需承担任何费用,没有场地限制,可节省更多时间;且不受疫情影响,数据统计方法更加优化。 结论 网络直播作为一种新型媒介具有更多的优势,为肝移植术后受者的宣教提供了新的形式,对提高肝移植受者长期生存率、改善受者生活质量具有重要意义 Abstract:Objective To evaluate the role of live webcast as a new medium in the propaganda and education of liver transplant recipients. Methods According to the contents of live webcast propaganda and education meeting for liver transplant recipients, relevant data of the live webcast meeting were counted and analyzed, including baseline data of participants, participation pattern, viewing frequency and duration, etc. The characteristics between live webcast and traditional propaganda and education meetings were compared. Results By the end of the live webcast meeting, 273 participants were registered, including 2 oversea participants and 271 from China. These domestic participants were from 26 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in China. The total number of views was 1 526. Participants attended the meeting by clicking direct link (n=243), WeChat group access (n=22), WeChat chat access (n=7) and Dingding App access (n=1). The viewing duration was (68± 5) min. Compared with the traditional method, the number and places of registers of the live webcast propaganda and education meeting were increased. The questioning methods and filling out follow-up information were more convenient. Participants could attend the meeting free from charge anywhere, and saved more time. The live webcast propaganda and education meeting was not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and data statistical method was optimized. Conclusions Live webcast as a new medium, has a wide range of advantages, which provides a novel form of propaganda and education for the recipients after liver transplantation. It is of significance to improve the long-term survival rate and to enhance the quality of life of recipients after liver transplantation. -
表 1 网络直播与传统方式宣教会议特点的比较
Table 1. Comparison of features between live webcast and traditional propaganda and education meeting
项目 网络直播会议方式 传统方式 登记人数 273人 67人 国内注册地点(省级单位) 26个 13个 提问方式 会前提问及现场提问 现场提问 随访资料填写方式 线上填报 线下填报 随访资料填写人员 听者本人 医务人员 参会方式 线上(浏览器、微信) 现场 承担费用 无 交通、住宿、餐饮 参会地点 无场地限制 需准备会场 时间消耗 会议时间 交通、住宿及会议时间 数据统计 网络平台及人工统计 人工统计 疫情影响 不受疫情影响 受疫情影响 -
[1] 薛召, 田敏, 杜妍莹, 等.远程随访管理系统在肝移植受者延续护理中的应用[J].护理学杂志, 2019, 34(21):73-76. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.21.073.XUE Z, TIAN M, DU YY, et al. Application of remote follow-up management system in transitional care of liver transplant recipients[J]. J Nursing Sci, 2019, 34(21):73-76. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2019.21.073. [2] 许小燕, 窦姗姗, 秦伟, 等.线上与线下相结合多途径宣教模式在辅助生殖初诊患者健康教育中应用研究[J].现代医药卫生, 2020, 36(11):1724-1727. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2020.11.040.XU XY, DOU SS, QIN W, et al. Research on the application of the online and offline multi-channel publicity and education model in the health education of first-time patients with assisted reproduction[J]. J Mod Med Health, 2020, 36(11):1724-1727. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2020.11.040. [3] World Health Organization. WHO director-general' s remarks at the media briefing on 2019-nCoV on 11 Februray 2020[EB/OL]. [2020-02-12]. http://www.un.org.cn/info/7/1044.html. [4] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会.新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗指南(试行第六版)[S/OL].[2020-02-19]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-02/19/content_5480948.htm. [5] 龙丹, 秦凌辉, 高山. 201例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者肝损害临床特征分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36(7):1567-1570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.07.023.LONG D, QIN LH, GAO S, et al. Clinical features of liver injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: an analysis of 201 cases[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36(7):1567-1570. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.07.023. [6] HANSEN ML, RASMUSSEN MI, RUBIN S, et al. Pilot test of an online training module on near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring for the randomised clinical trial SafeBoosC-Ⅲ[J]. Trials, 2020, 21(1):356. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4206-6. [7] 符巍, 刘小林.多学科团队网络随访对抑郁症患者服药依从性的影响[J].中国药业, 2020, 29(8):80-83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2020.08.024.FU W, LIU XL. Multidisciplinary team network follow-up study on medication compliance of depressive patients[J]. Chin Pharm, 2020, 29(8):80-83. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2020.08.024. [8] 侯芳."网络直播+翻转课堂"在高校思政教育中的创新应用研究[J].教育教学论坛, 2020(11):66-67. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JYJU202011029.htmHOU F. Research on the innovative application of " webcast+flipped classroom" in ideological and political education in colleges and universities[J]. Educ Teach Forum, 2020(11):66-67. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JYJU202011029.htm [9] O' DOHERTY D, DROMEY M, LOUGHEED J, et al. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education - an integrative review[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2018, 18(1):130. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1240-0. [10] 刘佳. "直播+教育": "互联网+"学习的新形式与价值探究[J].远程教育杂志, 2017, 35(1):52-59. DOI: 10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2017.01.006.LIU J. "Live+education": a new form of "internet plus" learning and its value inquiry[J]. J Distance Educ, 2017, 35(1):52-59. DOI: 10.15881/j.cnki.cn33-1304/g4.2017.01.006. [11] JAIN A, AGARWAL R, CHAWLA D, et al. Tele-education vs classroom training of neonatal resuscitation: a randomized trial[J]. J Perinatol, 2010, 30(12):773-779. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2010.42. [12] NEUBERGER JM, BECHSTEIN WO, KUYPERS DR, et al. Practical recommendations for long-term management of modifiable risks in kidney and liver transplant recipients: a guidance report and clinical checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) group[J]. Transplantation, 2017, 101(4S Suppl 2): S1-S56. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001651. [13] JI MH, CALLAWAY NF, GREVEN MA, et al. Telemedicine follow-up for intravitreal bevacizumab injection in the Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP) cohort[J]. Clin Ophthalmol, 2020, 14:1161-1163. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S250361. [14] 戚旭.基于互联网的慢病管理闭环的构建与应用[J].中医药管理杂志, 2020, 28(2):145-147. DOI: 10.16690/j.cnki.1007-9203.2020.02.067.QI X. Construction and application of internet based closed loop for chronic disease management[J]. J Tradit Chin Med Manag, 2020, 28(2):145-147. DOI: 10.16690/j.cnki.1007-9203.2020.02.067. [15] 中华医学会器官移植学分会.肾移植术后随访规范(2019版)[J].器官移植, 2019, 10(6):667-671. DOI:10. 3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2019.06.006.Branch of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Medical Association. Specification for follow-up after renal transplantation (2019 edition)[J]. Organ Transplant, 2019, 10(6):667-671. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2019.06.006. [16] 陈颖, 叶朝, 韩晶.儿童肝移植术后健康教育内容与方式的现状研究[J].继续医学教育, 2020, 34(3):97-99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2020.03.051.CHEN Y, YE Z, HAN J. Research status of health education content and methods after pediatric liver transplantation[J]. Contin Med Educ, 2020, 34(3):97-99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2020.03.051. [17] LOEB N, OWENS JS, STROM M, et al. Long-term follow-up after pediatric liver transplantation: predictors of growth[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2018, 66(4):670-675. DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001815. [18] LAEEQ SM, HANIF FM, LUCK NH, et al. Living-donor liver transplant follow-up: a single center experience[J]. Exp Clin Transplant, 2017, 15(Suppl 1): 254-257. DOI: 10.6002/ect.mesot2016.P122. [19] KOZBIAL K, MOSER S, AL-ZOAIRY R, et al. Follow-up of sustained virological responders with hepatitis C and advanced liver disease after interferon/ribavirin-free treatment[J]. Liver Int, 2018, 38(6):1028-1035. DOI: 10.1111/liv.13629. [20] HERDEN U, FISCHER L, STERNECK M, et al. Long-term follow-up after full-split liver transplantation and its applicability in the recent transplant era[J]. Clin Transplant, 2018, 32(3):e13205. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13205. [21] ALLOM V, JONGENELIS M, SLEVIN T, et al. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of campaigns delivered via various combinations of television and online media[J]. Front Public Health, 2018, 6:83. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00083. [22] THUKRAL A, SASI A, CHAWLA D, et al. Online neonatal training and orientation programme in India (ONTOP-IN)--the way forward for distance education in developing countries[J]. J Trop Pediatr, 2012, 58(6): 486-490. DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fms029. [23] BRUSAMENTO S, KYAW BM, WHITING P, et al. Digital health professions education in the field of pediatrics: systematic review and Meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2019, 21(9):e14231. DOI: 10.2196/14231. [24] LI A, HUANG X, ZHU T. A systematic analysis of online broadcasts of suicidality in China[J]. Asia Pac Psychiatry, 2018, 10(3):e12302. DOI: 10.1111/appy.12302. [25] REARDON LC, DEPASQUALE EC, TARABAY J, et al. Heart and heart-liver transplantation in adults with failing Fontan physiology[J]. Clin Transplant, 2018, 32(8): e13329. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13329.