留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

食蟹猴腹主动脉补丁缝合术后的免疫排斥反应监测

赵成江 叶学军 陈姣 张汉成 周汇栋 邹志成 蔡志明 牟丽莎

赵成江, 叶学军, 陈姣, 等. 食蟹猴腹主动脉补丁缝合术后的免疫排斥反应监测[J]. 器官移植, 2017, 8(2): 127-131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2017.02.007
引用本文: 赵成江, 叶学军, 陈姣, 等. 食蟹猴腹主动脉补丁缝合术后的免疫排斥反应监测[J]. 器官移植, 2017, 8(2): 127-131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2017.02.007
Zhao Chengjiang, Ye Xuejun, Chen Jiao, et al. Monitoring of immune rejection after abdominal aortic patch suture in cynomolgus monkeys[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 8(2): 127-131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2017.02.007
Citation: Zhao Chengjiang, Ye Xuejun, Chen Jiao, et al. Monitoring of immune rejection after abdominal aortic patch suture in cynomolgus monkeys[J]. ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 8(2): 127-131. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2017.02.007

食蟹猴腹主动脉补丁缝合术后的免疫排斥反应监测

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2017.02.007
基金项目: 

深圳市高水平医学学科建设专项基金 2016031638

深圳市三名工程;深圳市科创委学科布局项目 JCYJ20160229204849975

深圳市科创委企业工程中心项目 GCZX2015043017281705

深圳市卫计委临床技术研究与转化类 201501018

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    牟丽莎, Email:molly__molly@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R-332, R617

Monitoring of immune rejection after abdominal aortic patch suture in cynomolgus monkeys

More Information
  • 摘要:   目的  建立腹主动脉补丁缝合术的异种移植模型以及术后免疫排斥监测平台。  方法  将野生型巴马猪的颈动脉,修剪成约2.5 cm×1.0 cm大小的梭形补丁,缝合于食蟹猴腹主动脉,未给予免疫抑制剂。观察受体猴一般情况。术后1年采用病理学检查观察移植物动脉补丁的形态学变化。分别在术前和术后7、14、28、49 d采集受体猴血液样本,利用猪的红细胞、外周血单核细胞(PBMC)检测受体猴血清中针对猪抗原的IgM和IgG抗体水平。采用血常规五分类法和流式细胞术检测受体猴血液中淋巴细胞计数。  结果  3只移植猴存活状态良好。术后1年动脉补丁所在的血管壁外侧组织呈现深红色,苏木素-伊红(HE)染色显示有大量的红细胞和血小板沉积,其中有淋巴细胞的浸润。以猪的红细胞和PBMC为靶细胞,血清中的抗猪IgM和IgG抗体水平在术后28 d达到峰值,术后49 d时水平有所下降。淋巴细胞、T细胞亚群也是在术后28 d达到峰值,49 d开始回落。  结论  动脉补丁缝合术是一种便捷可靠的异种移植模型。没有免疫抑制剂的条件下,受体维持了正常的生理状态。移植物可有效激活受体的免疫系统,诱导抗猪抗体的产生,引发细胞免疫排斥反应,因此该模型可用于监测异种移植过程中的免疫排斥反应。

     

  • 图  1  动脉补丁缝合术示意图及术后图片

    A图为动脉补丁缝合术手术方法示意图;B图中左图为手术结束后缝合效果,右图为术后1年的补丁缝合处

    Figure  1.  Schematic diagram and postoperative images of the artery patch suture

    图  2  受体猴动脉切片的病理学图片(HE)

    A图为补丁缝合处;B图为非补丁缝合处

    Figure  2.  Pathological images of the arterial segment of the recipient monkey

    图  3  手术后受体猴血清中针对猪IgM和IgG抗体的水平变化

    以猪(野生型和GTKO型)的红细胞和PBMC检测个时间点的异种抗体水平。血清中结合到红细胞上的IgM(A图)和IgG(B图)水平;血清中结合到PBMC上的IgM(C图)和IgG(D图)水平;以野生型猪的细胞为靶细胞,与术后0 d比较,aP<0.05,bP<0.05;同一时间点的血清样本,与GTKO型猪的细胞比较,cP<0.05,dP<0.05

    Figure  3.  Changes of IgM and IgG antibodies levels in the serum of recipient monkeys after surgery

    图  4  手术后受体猴血细胞计数的变化

    A图为术后各时间点白细胞计数的变化;B图为术后各时间点的淋巴细胞亚群分类

    Figure  4.  Changes of blood cell counts in recipient monkeys after surgery

  • [1] 窦科峰, 李霄, 陶开山, 等.异种肝移植现状与未来[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(1):14-18. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWK201401007.htm

    Dou KF, Li X, Tao KS, et al. Current status and prospects of liver xenotransplantation[J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2014, 34(1):14-18. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWK201401007.htm
    [2] Ekser B, Ezzelarab M, Hara H, et al, Clinical xenotransplantation: the next medical revolution? [J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9816): 672-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61091-X.
    [3] Griesemer A, Yamada K, Sykes M. Xenotransplantation: immunological hurdles and progress toward tolerance[J].Immunol Rev, 2014, 258(1):241-58. DOI: 10.1111/imr.12152.
    [4] 姚丹华, 李幼生, 黎介寿.异种移植的研究进展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2013, 20(12) 1437-1441. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12219.

    Yao DH, Li YS, Li JS. Research progress of xenotransplantation[J]. Chin J Bases Clin Gen Surg, 2013, 20(12) 1437-1441. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12219.
    [5] Cooper DK, Ezzelarab MB, Hara H, et al. The pathobiology of pig-to-primate xenotransplantation: a historical review[J]. Xenotransplantation, 2016, 23(2):83-105. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12219.
    [6] Vadori M, Cozzi E. The immunological barriers to xenotransplantation[J]. Tissue Antigens, 2015, 86(4):239-253. DOI: 10.1111/tan.12669.
    [7] Cooper DK, Ekser B, Tector AJ. Immunobiological barriers to xenotransplantation[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 23(Pt B):211-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.068.
    [8] Espinosa JR, Samy KP, Kirk AD. Memory T cells in organ transplantation: progress and challenges[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2016, 12(6):339-347. DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.9.
    [9] Ville S, Poirier N, Blancho G, et al, .Co-stimulatory blockade of the CD28/CD80-86/CTLA-4 balance in transplantation: impact on memory T cells? [J]. Front Immunol, 2015, 6: 411. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00411. eCollection 2015.
    [10] Mohiuddin MM, Singh AK, Corcoran PC, et al. Chimeric 2C10R4 anti-CD40 antibody therapy is critical for long-term survival of GTKO.hCD46.hTBM pig-to-primate cardiac xenograft[J]. Nat Commun, 2016, 7:11138. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11138.
    [11] Abicht JM, Mayr T, Reichart B, et al. Pre-clinical heterotopic intrathoracic heart xenotransplantation: a possibly useful clinical technique[J]. Xenotransplantation, 2015, 22(6):427-442. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12213.
    [12] Iwase H, Liu H, Wijkstrom M, et al. Pig kidney graft survival in a baboon for 136 days: longest life-supporting organ graft survival to date[J]. Xenotransplantation, 2015, 22(4): 302-309. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12174.
    [13] Wijkstrom M, Iwase H, Paris W, et al. Renal xenotransplantation: experimental progress and clinical prospects[J]. Kidney Int. 2016, DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.08.035 [Epub ahead of print].
    [14] Ekser B, Markmann JF, Tector AJ. Current status of pig liver xenotransplantation[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 23(Pt B): 240-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.083.
    [15] Meier RP, Navarro-Alvarez N, Morel P, et al. Current status of hepatocyte xenotransplantation[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 23(Pt B):273-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.077.
    [16] Ezzelarab MB, Ekser B, Echeverri G, et al. Costimulation blockade in pig artery patch xenotransplantation-a simple model to monitor the adaptive immune response in nonhuman primates[J]. Xenotransplantation, 2012, 19(4): 221-232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2012.00711.x.
    [17] Iwase H, Ekser B, Satyananda V, et al. Initial in vivo experience of pig artery patch transplantation in baboons using mutant MHC (CIITA-DN) pigs[J]. Transpl Immunol, 2015, 32(2): 99-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2015.02.003.
  • 加载中
图(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  134
  • HTML全文浏览量:  18
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-01-03
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-01-19
  • 刊出日期:  2017-03-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回