System evaluation of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open living donor nephrectomy
-
摘要:
目的 系统评价手助腹腔镜下活体供肾切取术(HLDN)与开放活体供肾切取术(ODN)的安全性及效果。 方法 采用计算机互联网检索Pubmed数据库、Sciverse数据库、考克兰图书馆数据库、中国知网、中文科技期刊数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库及万方数据库收录期刊已发表的包含HLDN和ODN两种术式的随机对照试验(RCT)研究。两位研究者根据纳入、排除标准独立筛选文献,应用RevMan 5.2软件进行Meta分析。 结果 通过筛选共纳入10个RCT,共1 230例患者。Meta分析结果提示,活体供肾取肾时,与ODN术式比较,HLDN术式的手术时间和热缺血时间较长[合并比值比(OR)值为35.81,95%可信区间(CI)13.98~57.65,P=0.001;合并OR 43.99,95% CI 32.31~55.66,P<0.00001],但HLDN术式的术中出血量较少(合并OR-78.90,95% CI -123.59~-34.22,P=0.0005)、并发症发生率较低(合并OR0.58,95%CI0.39~0.86,P=0.006)、住院时间较短[权重均差(WMD)为-1.15,95%CI-1.40~-0.90,P<0.00001];两组患者的术后进普食时间差异无统计学意义(WMD为-0.11,95%CI -0.67~-0.45,P=0.70)。 结论 与ODN术式比较,HLDN术式提高了手术的安全性,降低了手术难度,值得临床推广应用。 Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HLDN) and open donor nephrectomy (ODN) systematically. Methods Literatures of randomized controlled trials (RCT) about HLDN and ODN were searched in Pubmed, Sciverse, Cochrone Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), China Scientific Journal Database(VIP), China Biology Medicine(CBM), and Wangfang Database through internet. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2 reviewers screened the literatures independently, and Meta-analysis was conducted by software RevMan 5.2. Results A total of 10 RCTs including 1 230 patients were eligible after screening.Compared with ODN, the Meta-analysis revealed that HLDN possessed significantly longer operation duration and warm ischemia time [pooled odds ratio(OR)=35.81,95% confidence interval(CI):13.98-57.65, P=0.001; pooled OR=43.99, 95%CI: 32.31-55.66, P<0.00001), but less intraoperative blood loss(pooled OR=-78.90, 95% CI: -123.59--34.22, P=0.0005), lower incidence of complications (pooled OR=0.58, 95%CI: 0.39-0.86, P=0.006), and shorter hospital length of stay [weight mean difference (WMD)=-1.15, 95%CI:-1.40--0.90, P<0.00001]. There was no significant difference in the time of taking normal diet between two groups(WMD=-0.11, 95%CI:-0.67 --0.45, P=0.70). Conclusions Compared with ODN, HLDN can improve the safety of operation and reduce the difficulty of operation. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application. -
Key words:
- Hand-assisted laparoscopic /
- Open surgery /
- Living donor nephrectomy /
- Meta-analysis /
-
表 1 本研究纳入的10篇文献的特征
Table 1. Characteristics of 10 literatures in this study(x±s)
文 献国家 例数
(H/O)年龄
(岁,H/O)手术时间
(min,H/O)术中出血量
(ml,H/O)热缺血时间
(s,H/O)并发症
(例,H/O)住院时间
(d,H/O)术后进食时
间(d,H/O)Rajab A,et al[4] 加拿大 47/30 38.0±11.0/
46.4±14.6184±39/
143±27150±157/
234±190189±73/
177±1216/5 — — Salazar A,et al[5] 美国 24/15 44±10/
41±8235±28/
188±40— — 0/1 4.0±1.0/
5±0.7— Kim BS,et al[6] 韩国 118/123 39.5/40.5 171±47/
163±25207±78/
232±101292±139/
236±882/0 5.9±2.3/
6.8±3.11.4±0.6/
2.0±0.7El-Galley R,et al[7] 美国 17/55 39±12 294±42/
163±24167±70/
320± 99120±120/
120±60— — — Wolf JS Jr,et al[8] 美国 23/27 38±11/
41±12206±32/
125±36156±148/
216±280183±122/
96±574/4 1.7±0.9/
2.6±0.70.83±0.58/
0.88±0.42Lee KS,et al[9] 韩国 85/115 37.0±10.0/
40.8±10.3191.5±36.4/
184.0±28.7235.6±167.9/
241.7±171.2128.3±43.1/
87.0±54.96/2 — 2.3±0.9/
1.8±0.7Stifelman MD,et al[10] 美国 60/31 41.6±10.6/
42.4±9.5240.0±88.4/
265.0±50.582.9±61.8/
364±449121.0±38.7/
03/2 3.5±0.7/
4.5±1.21.4±1.3/
1.7±0.7Chandak P,et al[11] 英国 144/56 44±10/
47±12198±42/
171±39— — 23/21 — — Minnee RC,et al[12] 荷兰 158/44 46.7±12.5/
44.7±10.6173.8±43.7/
123.7±31.9— 192±114/
186±1825/5 4.9±2.0/
9.6±5.1— 陈明,等[13] 中国 25/33 42±17/
41±14138±42/
148±2853±32/
128±48138±12/
96±180/4 7.2±1.7/
10.4±2.8— 注:H/O为HLDN组与ODN组,—为资料缺如 表 2 本研究纳入的10篇文献的质量评价
Table 2. Quality assessment of 10 literatures in this study
文 献发表时间
(年份)是否说明
纳入标准是否随
机分组随机方案
是否隐藏是否进行
偏倚讨论是否使用
盲法统计方法
是否得当质量
等级Rajab A,et al[4] 2005 是 未描述 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 C级 Salazar A,et al[5] 2005 是 未描述 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 C级 Kim BS,et al[6] 2010 是 未描述 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 C级 El-Galley R,et al[7] 2004 是 未描述 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 C级 Wolf JS Jr,et al[8] 2001 是 是 是 是 是 是 A级 Lee KS,et al[9] 2007 是 是 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 B级 Stifelman MD,et al[10] 2001 是 未描述 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 C级 Chandak P,et al[11] 2009 是 未描述 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 C级 Minnee RC,et al[12] 2008 是 未描述 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 C级 陈明,等[13] 2010 是 未描述 不清楚 不清楚 不清楚 是 C级 -
[1] Nakada SY, Moon TD, Gist M, et al. Use of the pneumo sleeve as an adjunct in laparoscopic nephrectomy[J]. Urology,1997,49(4):612-613. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)80003-9 [2] Villeda-Sandoval CI, Rodríguez-Covarrubias F, Cortés-Aguilar G, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative and functional results in a tertiary care center in Mexico[J]. Transplant Proc,2013,45(9):3220-3224. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.055 [3] Ku JH, Yeo WG, Han DH, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic and open living donor nephrectomy in Korea[J]. Int J Urol,2005,12(5):436-441. doi: 10.1111/iju.2005.12.issue-5 [4] Rajab A, Mahoney JE, Henry ML, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open nephrectomies in living donors[J]. Can J Surg,2005,48(2):123-130. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2107702104&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [5] Salazar A, Pelletier R, Yilmaz S, et al. Use of a minimally invasive donor nephrectomy program to select technique for live donor nephrectomy[J]. Am J Surg,2005,189(5):558-563. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.034 [6] Kim BS, Yoo ES, Kim TH, et al. Renal function recovery in donors and recipients after live donor nephrectomy: hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. open procedures[J]. Korean J Urol,2010,51(4):245-249. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.4.245 [7] El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, et al. Donor nephrectomy: a comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy[J]. J Urol,2004, 171(1):40-43. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100149.76079.89 [8] Wolf JS Jr, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy[J]. Transplantation,2001,72(2):284-290. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200107270-00021 [9] Lee KS, Hong JH, Jeon SS, et al. Comparison of graft survival in live donor nephrectomy: hand-assisted laparoscopic v open procedures[J]. J Endourol,2007,21(8):866-871. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0463 [10] Stifelman MD, Hull D, Sosa RE, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach[J]. J Urol, 2001,166(2):444-448. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65960-5 [11] Chandak P, Kessaris N, Challacombe B, et al. How safe is hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy? results of 200 live donor nephrectomies by two different techniques[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant,2009,24(1):293-297. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=2116325030&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [12] Minnee RC, Bemelman F, Kox C, et al. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy in living donors[J]. Int J Urol,2008,15(3):206-209. doi: 10.1111/iju.2008.15.issue-3 [13] 陈明,陈恕求,柳靖,等.手助腹腔镜与开放手术活体供肾取肾术的比较[J].江苏医药,2010,36(19):2240-2242. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YIYA201019003.htmChen M, Chen SQ, Liu J, et al. A comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open operation for donor nephrectomy in living renal transplantation[J]. Jiangsu Med J,2010,36(19):2240-2242. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YIYA201019003.htm [14] Zhang GT, Liang D, Zhang XD. Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical distal gastrectomy for obese patients[J]. Am Surg,2013,79(12):1273-1278. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=127873999&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [15] Shussman N, Brown MR, Johnson MC, et al. Does nasogastric tube decompression get used less often with laparoscopic and hand-assisted compared with open colectomy?[J]. Surg Endosc,2013,27(12):4564-4568. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3124-z